The authors argue that... it is imperative for schools to adopt an assets based model as opposed to a deficit based model. This is because the process of building up students' strengths fosters more growth and learning and is proven to be more successful than the process of fixing students' weaknesses and risky behaviors.
Three Talking Points:
Beginning: The beginning of this reading identifies the issue that schools tend to use deficit models as opposed to asset models. In a deficit model, if a student is failing, the assumption is that the student is not trying hard enough and educators and schools have to fix this problem. The authors write, "it seems the education field is focusing too heavily on reducing risks, when a higher emphasis should be placed on building up student strengths." They identify 40 assets that students may have and split them between external and internal assets. They argue that if schools put their energy towards building up their students assets, risk reduction will occur naturally.
Middle: The middle section points out that asset based models support higher partnerships between schools, parents, and the community. In deficit situations, community members could be unwilling to be supportive to youth as they are associated with being "trouble-makers." In contrast, the authors note, "When the focus shifts to assets, community members can easily work together to build up and nurture positive attributes in youth." When adults see all of the good things that children and adolescents can provide for their communities, they will be more willing to support their growth as students! Youth programs are super beneficial for students are very reliable for providing predictable thriving outcomes for student success.
End: The ending section was most impactful to read, as it emphasizes specifically the importance of building assets in middle school settings. This section notes that the largest drop of assets in a student happens between seventh and eighth grade. The authors note that it is during the middle years of education that less asset building opportunities are typically provided to these students, yet these years are the most pivotal in terms of a student either becoming a high achiever or getting off academic track and leading towards frustration and/or failure. Educators have a very large role in ensuring that their students do not get off track. One study even claimed that "teachers’ expectations impact student success more than a student’s own motivation.” This was super powerful to read because educators really make a huge influence in a child's life!!!
Reflections/Connections:
First, I really appreciated the academic tone and formatting of this reading, it really took me back to my undergraduate days of reading peer reviewed articles and papers! I really appreciated the quantifiable statistics they provided throughout the paper as well, such as the number of assets there are and how many an average sixth grader possess, and how that number decreases until they reach adulthood. For me, I find quantitative data to strengthen a piece of research and it makes me conceptualize the issue at hand a bit better.
After reading this, I definitely agreed with the argument presented by the authors. It was concise and straight to the point. The asset based model corroborates with the way in which I view my classroom because it is so much more powerful to assess what your students can do and are capable of versus what they cannot do and what they are lacking. Also, one thing I have been engraining with my first graders is the power of the word "yet." This word can have such a huge impact and it's only three letters. During social emotional learning blocks, I really try to motivate my students when we are about to learn a very new concept. Instead of saying "I can't do this" say "I can't do this yet." This is one way that I connected to the reading because saying yet switches to an asset/growth mindset versus a deficit one. I think that fostering growth mindsets in our students would be essential to an asset based model, and here is an image on some of the ways educators can do this!
Finally, the portion of the text that discussed how asset based models strengthen family and community partnership really resonated with me because it made me connect to something I learned from a different graduate course at RIC. Family partnerships are super important in the context of a school. However, it is important to note that for families who come from low socioeconomic status, there are many factors that could potentially contribute to them being less involved in their schools, such as personal previous negative experiences, inadequate access to transportation, language barriers, work conflicts, etc. There are so many benefits to a family being involved more in their child's progress in and out of school, and schools need to ensure they are reducing barriers for families to be involved in the school community. As an educator who works in a Title I school district, this is especially relevant, and educators have a responsibility to involve families and inform them on their child's growth so they can also support at home. This resource from the IRISCenter on family engagement gives advice to educators on how they can better strengthen the partnership with families.
Thank you for sharing your insights, Michele! I appreciate how you addressed the power of "yet" and that you talk about this with your students frequently. This fosters a growth mindset in students and teaches them that not everything will come easily right away and that they have the power within them to achieve by having growth mindset.
ReplyDeleteHi Michele!
ReplyDeleteI also had a strong reaction to hearing that my expectations as a teacher have a strong impact on the achievements of my students. It feels exciting and pressuring at the same time to consider that I can have such a big impact on my students, maybe without even realizing it.
I appreciate your use of the word "yet" with your students! I had thought about making that a common classroom phrase, but my students organically gravitated more towards changing "I can't do it" to "It's hard - and we can do hard things." Watching that growth mindset grow in real time is very exciting!
I appreciate your IRISCenter Resource a lot, as I had also been contemplating better ways to connect with and support my students and families in lower socio-economic classes.
I really enjoyed reading your post because your classroom example makes the asset-based model feel so practical and intentional. I absolutely love the phrase “the power of yet.” I was first introduced to it in another course I took, and I had never heard it before then, but it completely changed how I think about struggle and learning. After learning about it, I started using it at home, and my son actually told me his teacher says the same thing and even has posters about it around the classroom. I love that reinforcement because it shows how powerful consistent language can be for kids. Shifting from “I can’t do this” to “I can’t do this yet” feels small, but it completely changes the mindset from fixed to growth. What you’re doing with your first graders is such a strong example of how an asset-based approach starts with everyday words and encouragement.
ReplyDeleteHi Michele, I loved your insight this week! I appreciated your point of having quantitative data. My undergrad was in Sociology where I was reviewing journal articles with studies and results and didn't realize how much I missed it until I sat with your point in bringing it up! Thank you for including the IRISCenter page. We have a handful of students in tough situations right now and I will use that page to inform our Saturday Academy teachers on how they can uplift students and not fall into that deficit model if they are unable to attend class or falling behind.
ReplyDeleteHi Michele, I really enjoyed your take on this week's reading! I loved your "power of yet". I often find myself encouraging my students in the same type of way. You are helping the students shift into a more growth mindset even at a young age in first grade.
ReplyDeleteMichele! I loved reading your personal reflections on the reading-- I agree that the tone of the piece reminded me a lot of the readings I was doing in my undergrad. I also had a similar reflection about the connection to growth mindset, I think it's a way to acknowledge the academic "holes" or gaps that a student may have while also focusing on the assets that a student has. When I was in sixth grade, my middle school had one school-wide focus and that was growth mindset, being so young and having it so deeply rooted into me deeply changed me as a learner (as an eventual teacher) and as a person.
ReplyDeleteI love love what you said about the power of the word yet. This is something I will definitely be stealing for my students. I can tell you are a great teacher. Encouraging your students this way is beyond meaningful, it allows them to believe in themselves but also see that there is someone in their corner who is constantly pushing them.
ReplyDeleteAlso, I super agree with your piece about family relations. There is many times that teachers won't want to reach out to certain families because they are less responsive. However, we fail to realize that this doesn't (always) mean that they don't care about their students, but that there might be barriers that are stopping the families from being involved.
The growth mindset work definitely resonates here. And I was so interested in what you said about the comfort you have with the quantitative data these authors used. (I will be very curious how you make sense of the reading next week as Delpit uses mostly qualitative data to support her claims!)
ReplyDeleteMichele,
ReplyDeleteI really appreciated how clearly you structured your talking points. Your explanation of the deficit model at the beginning was especially strong because you highlighted the subtle assumption embedded in it: when a student is failing, we assume the student needs fixing. That shift from “What is wrong with the system?” to “What is wrong with the child?” is exactly what the authors are challenging.
I also loved your connection to the word “yet.” That is such a simple but powerful classroom move. It captures the heart of asset-based thinking in a way that is developmentally appropriate for first graders. It reframes struggle without denying it. Instead of lowering expectations, it maintains belief in capacity. That directly connects to the quote you included about teacher expectations impacting success more than motivation. If students internalize that belief from us, it can change how they approach learning long-term.
Your reflection on family engagement was also important. I appreciated that you named the structural barriers that can impact involvement, especially in Title I contexts. It connects well to the authors’ argument that asset-based thinking must extend beyond individual classrooms and into partnerships. When schools see families as assets rather than deficits, collaboration becomes more authentic.
Your post highlights that asset orientation is not abstract. It shows up in language, expectations, and relationship-building every day.